Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Bonus question answer
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Midterm Question 5
Social media has done a few interesting things to conversation patterns. For one, Twitter and Facebook statuses have made sentences shorter and statements more direct.
Social media also relies on the master of the interview type of conversation pattern. Media users engage different platforms to test the messages spread by companies, politicians and traditional media. Social media allows them to test the messages by posing questions designed to break down anything that is untrue.
Social media is also designed to get people talking. There are less two-way, engaging conversations because users rarely know each other outside of the Internet. Social media encourages conversations based on short, impersonal comments.
Consumers of our content expect one thing. As Mitch Joel said consumers expect consistency. Be consistent in the message. Now that there are so many messages floating around from so many sources, consistency leads to trust, this leads to you developing an audience.
The only way to “level” the expectations consumers have of us is to use a conversation pattern that involves compromise. Read what is being written about your product or brand and adapt to the needs of the consumers. Social media is based on the exchange of ideas and, for PR practitioners, understanding what the public is asking is the key to a successful career.
Midterm answers. Question 4
Jamie Zawinski is the creator of Mozilla Firefox and other free software projects. He also worked on programming for the earliest versions of Netscape.
He also came up with the idea of software bloat. Basically, he says that internet sites start off as great, small applications that do something really well. Attitudes and the founders try to expand the sites and they become bigger, but not better.
Zawinksi is also important because of what he tried to do with Mozilla. He opened the program’s code up to the public. Users could then make improvements on the program they are using.
Zawinski's opinion of software bloat, in a way, explains social media. The design principle that applications are at their best when they are on a smaller scale. I believe in this, a site like buzzword, which has one major application, is more useful to me than Myspace, which does a lot of things, but none of them particularly well.
Social media can also be judged on this type of principle. Hugely popular sites like Facebook begin as something small and grow into behemouths. This can have a negative effect on user satisfaction and it often convinces its consumers to look use different applications.
Zawinksi also gave the consumers access to the product, and they brought forward the ideas that shaped it. In public relations, practitioners will soon have to work directly with consumers because the consumer is gaining more control over the market every day. Zawinski is a pioneer of the idea that things can be improved if they are put in the hands of the people that use them.
It’s also interesting that his drive to make everyone able to modify source code led to his eventual disillusionment with the computer industry.He gave it all up to open a night club. Zawinski also serves as an example of the problems that can occur when too many people have too much of an opportunity to contribute.
Aside from that, without this guy, I wouldn't be able to post my answers on Squidoo.
Midterm answers Question 3
Does the medium enhance a personal trait
Social media absolutely enhances a personal trait. People's sense of community is enhanced through the use of social media. Look at our class, we came in as strangers, and now we're a community of students. This was enhanced through our use of ning, wiggio and other social media as a form of early communication. What interpreting whether or not a social media application is useful or effective, the first thing I look at is whether it helps create a community.
What medium does the new medium make obsolete?
Unfortunately for me, a former journalist, social media is making broadcast news and newspapers obsolete. As I said earlier, anyone can create news. (Even this guy)
The other disappointing part of social media is that it has eliminated the need for face-to-face contact. I can keep a close relationship with people I've never met without leaving my house. This is great for networking, but having to create a personal brand online, rather than having people associate your brand with what you do on a daily basis seems like humans are taking a step backwards.
What does the medium retrieve?
Keeping in line with what I said above, social media has helped people retrieve their own voice. Without the internet, average people had a tough time having their ideas heard. Now, with the social media explosion, there is almost an overflow of opinion. You can find opinions of all sorts, with the click of a mouse. To me, that's what social media should do.
What does the new medium reverse?
Social media has changed the way people communicate with each other. All communication used to be top down and linear. Not anymore.
Now, since everyone has a voice, communication comes from all sides, all levels of people and through all mediums.
This is a great way to analyze if a social media site is working. If people are communicating in various ways, on various topics and there is no heirarchy, then that site is probably worth checking out.
Midterm question 2
Social media champions the idea that anyone can write history simply by giving anyone and everyone that very opportunity. Now, if a major event happens, anybody can write how they feel and post that into cyberspace. It used to be that history came from newspapers, broadcast accounts or literary records. Not anymore. Social media users are recording history without really knowing it.
I agree that everyone should be able to voice their opinions, but I don’t think anyone should have the license to write human history. The authority to write history should come only after meticulous research and reporting to ensure all angles are covered. I’d rather read an encyclopedia than hear Buddy from next door tell me about recent historic events.
The beauty of Wikipedia is that there is no heirarchy of authority. The opinions are anonymous and that's why it works. No one is better than anyone else. As I said, I don't think Wikipedia should be considered exact history, but I like that people have the chance to give their own two cents.
As far as if there is a canon. I think it depends on the issue. There are recognized experts in every field, and they have the experience and have earned their legitimacy. The work of these people, like a Noam Chomsky, will also be more authoritative than any average person's take on things.
Some additional reading I found interesting when forming my opinions. Click here and here.
Midterm question 1
"Today's online audiences will target your brand. PR professionals can go directly to the public. Or better yet, they'll come to you" - Brian Cross
Public relations officials will be important in helping company’s adjust to this change. Not only are PR professionals the people who will spread the message, but they will also determine who needs to be reach. Scouring industry blogs, relevant internet personalities and social media sites will be required work for those in PR. They need to know what the public is saying in order to figure out who they should target.
Basically, the audience for public relations is changing. Public relations practitioners need to enter this on the ground floor become engaged with social media and target the audience that will be most interested in the message being spread.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Social media for the sports fan
Did you happen to catch the score of last night's ball game?